Screen Solutions
A screen that is awkward to operate stops being used by about the third week. How you run it deserves as much thought as which fabric goes on it — and most of that thinking has to happen before anything is fixed to the wall.
The problem
Of the four layers — system, fabric, application and control — control is the one most often treated as a detail to sort out at the end. It is also the one that decides whether the system gets used daily or gets used twice.
The failure is predictable. A remote lives in a drawer. A wall control ends up somewhere nobody walks past. Four openings need four separate actions when they should need one. None of those are product faults; they are planning faults, and they are cheap to avoid and expensive to correct.
Control also has a hard dependency that catches people out: most control problems turn out to be power problems. Where power can reach constrains what control scheme is possible, and that is a decision made with the housing, not after it.
The options
01 — Remote
The simplest option and the one most systems ship with. It works, it needs no wiring beyond the motor itself, and it is entirely adequate for a single opening. Its weakness is that a remote is an object that can be mislaid, and on a multi-opening patio juggling one remote across several channels gets tiresome quickly.
02 — Wall control
A fixed control in a sensible place is what turns a screen into part of the house rather than a gadget. The position matters more than the model: on the route you already walk when you close up, at a height that works, and visible enough that a guest can find it. This is worth deciding at the design stage because it usually means a cable.
03 — Grouping
On a patio with three or four openings, the single most valuable control decision is grouping — one action that closes a whole side, or the whole space. It removes the friction that otherwise stops people using the system on a busy evening, and it costs nothing extra if it is planned rather than retrofitted.
04 — Automation
Motorized screens can be brought into a compatible home automation platform where the motor and the platform support each other. Progressive Screens publishes which motor brands and integration platforms its systems currently work with, and that list changes over time — so the honest answer for any specific home is that it has to be confirmed against your equipment rather than assumed.
What we will not do is tell you your existing system will work before anyone has checked. Compatibility depends on the motor selected, the platform version and the integration method.
The dependency
Before any of the above is a real option, power has to reach the opening. Not the wall nearby, not the nearest outlet — the housing itself.
On new construction that is close to free: a cable run decided at framing costs almost nothing and disappears into the structure. On an existing patio it may mean a surface run, a route through a soffit, or in some cases a genuine constraint on where a screen can go at all. It is one of the things we look at during the measure, and it is a common reason a specification changes between the first conversation and the quote.
This is also why automation can usually be added later but power usually cannot. If there is any prospect of wanting integration in future, the time to run the cable is now.
What we confirm rather than claim. Motor options, supported platforms and integration methods are the manufacturer's and they change. We confirm what is currently available for your specific configuration, in writing, before anything is quoted — rather than publishing a compatibility list here that may be out of date by the time you read it.
Where it matters most
Questions
Often yes, provided the motor selected supports it and power is already in the right place. That second condition is the one that catches people — automation can usually be added afterwards, but running power to an opening after finishes are on is a different job. If integration is even a possibility, plan the cable now.
It may, and we will confirm rather than assume. Compatibility depends on which motor is selected, which platform you run and which integration method is available. We check the manufacturer's current published support against your specific equipment before quoting. We will not tell you it is compatible on the basis of a brand name.
Yes, with grouping — and on a patio with several openings it is the single most valuable control decision you can make. It is far easier to plan at specification than to retrofit afterwards.
A motorized screen needs power to move. Behaviour during an outage depends on the motor and configuration selected, so it is something to raise at specification if it matters to you rather than something we can answer generically here.
Not strictly, but on anything beyond one opening we would generally suggest both. A remote is convenient and losable; a fixed control in the right place is what makes the system part of the daily routine.
It can. Number of controls, cable runs, grouping and any integration work all feed into it, alongside the openings themselves — the cost guide covers how these pieces come together in a quote.
Start a project
